反恐版的十二怒汉！政客和军方各人的博弈冲突太精彩。
关于道德悖论，这部电影还展现了一个变种的有轨电车问题：是采取行动 do something，现在就让一个小女孩确定死去，还是等待延迟 do nothing，让商场里的几十几百人死于可能的袭击？是自己的reputation重要，不让自己双手沾上一点无辜者的鲜血，哪怕放任恐怖分子袭击平民，还是本着功利主义，为了多数人的效益而决定别的少数人的命运？如果这又牵扯到政治宣传 propaganda war呢？
最后我们（英国人）得到了什么？胜利？正义？未发生的自杀式袭击和平民伤亡？我看到的是一位失去女儿的可怜地向武装民兵求助的liberal 父亲，也许这才是最可悲－甚至可悲过仇恨的延续－的事情吧
【In war, truth is the first casualty. — Aeschylus】
「If Al-Shabab kill 80 people, we win the propaganda war. If we kill one child, they do.」
「We cannot engage in an argument about possible future postings on YouTube.
↓
With respect, General, revolutions are fueled by postings on YouTube.」
「Minister, we cannot have military decisions dictated by government committees. Nor can we put on hold a military operation at every stage for legal clarification. You tell us when to go to war, we conduct the war, you deal with the aftermath.
↓
If only it were that simple.」
「We have now done everything in our power to give this girl a chance to survive.」
「In my opinion, that was disgraceful. And all done from the safety of your chair.
↓
天空之眼：2015，不同职位的选择
转载请注明网址: https://www.nanrenkong.com/pp/dy-12526.html
